The usual failure in procedure consent is not the absence of a form. It is a form that cannot answer questions afterwards. Which wording did the patient actually see? Was it read before the day, or handed over on a trolley? Who signed, the patient or a relative, and who witnessed? A paper file often cannot say, and a WhatsApp photo of a paper form says even less.
This post is a practical description, not legal advice. Whether a particular consent process is sufficient for a particular procedure is a question for your counsel and, for hospital settings, your accreditation body. What follows is what a well-built record contains, and how CuraVerto's OT consent flow behaves today.
The OT consent link belongs to CuraVerto's IPD operation theatre module, which is part of the Plus plan and is switched on clinic by clinic. It covers two consents for a booked operation: surgical consent and anaesthesia consent. The design is built around one idea: the patient can read at home, but the signature that counts is the one given in the clinic with a witness.
CuraVerto stores the wording the patient was shown. If the clinic edits the wording between the patient loading the page and pressing submit, the submission is refused and the patient is asked to reload and read it again. A link can pre-sign each consent only once, so a link cannot be replayed. A consent already signed in the clinic cannot be overwritten by a later link signature. A suspended clinic's links stop working, and a case that is no longer booked or ready stops accepting them.
The in-clinic signature is a separate step that records the signer, the witness by name and a witness signature, and CuraVerto refuses a witness who is the same person as the signer. A link pre-signature does not satisfy the gate that lets the case proceed to theatre. Only the witnessed in-clinic consent does. The link is a courtesy to the patient, not a shortcut for the clinic.
The public link route logs no token, phone number or signature, and it writes at most one audit entry per link and consent type, so it cannot be used to flood the audit log.
CuraVerto records what was shown, who signed and when. It does not make a consent legally sufficient, and it does not choose the clinical content of the wording for you. The consent wording is the clinic's own text, and its adequacy for a specific procedure, patient and jurisdiction is a matter for the treating team and counsel. A digital signature drawn on a phone is a record of an act, and how a court or a regulator weighs it depends on the case.
CuraVerto separates consent into distinct records rather than one blanket. Appointment-level consent links, sent on WhatsApp, are signed tokens with a 24 hour expiry that the patient completes once, with the confirmation stored as a new record. Consent to data uses such as reminders and broadcasts is recorded per purpose, and withdrawing any of them is a new entry, not an edit. IVF consent has its own patient page and follows the clinic's ART documentation. In each case the consent table is insert-only: a withdrawal or a change is a new row that points at the old one.
In CuraVerto, the patient can read the surgical and anaesthesia consent wordings from a WhatsApp link and pre-sign them, but that pre-signature does not replace the witnessed signature in the clinic. The link page says so, and the system does not let a link pre-signature satisfy the gate before the case proceeds. Whether a remote signature is sufficient on its own for a given procedure is a question for your counsel.
The link expires after 72 hours. It is tied to one clinic, one operation case and one patient, and it can pre-sign each consent type only once. It also stops working if the clinic is suspended or the case is no longer booked or ready.
A good record shows the exact wording the patient saw, the procedure and planned time, who signed and in what capacity (patient or guardian, with name and relationship), a witness who is not the signer, a timestamp, the route used (in the clinic or by link), and a history where changes are new entries rather than edits. CuraVerto stores the wording shown, the signer type and the witness details for OT consents. Sufficiency for a specific procedure is for your counsel to judge.
The CuraVerto submission is refused. The system compares the wording the patient was shown with the current wording, and if they differ the patient is asked to reload the page and read the updated text before signing.
The CuraVerto OT consent link is part of the IPD operation theatre module, which is a Plus plan capability at ₹49,999 per year excluding GST and is switched on for a clinic by its settings. Other consent records, such as appointment consent links and data-use consents, are separate from the OT module.
CuraVerto stores the wording shown, the signer, the guardian details and the in-clinic witness for operation theatre consents, with an insert-only history. The OT module is part of the Plus plan at ₹49,999 per year excluding GST.
Prefer not to use WhatsApp? Leave your number and we will call.