Search for doctor commission tracking software and two completely different products turn up: platforms that take a cut of what your clinic earns, and payroll tools that calculate what your clinic owes its own doctors. CuraVerto is unambiguously the second kind and never the first, but that distinction confuses a lot of buyers who land on a no-commission pricing page and then wonder how they are supposed to pay a visiting doctor a percentage of procedure revenue without a spreadsheet. The short answer is that CuraVerto includes a doctor commission engine built for exactly that job. It has nothing to do with what CuraVerto charges the clinic, and everything to do with what the clinic pays its own doctors.
When clinic owners search for doctor commission software, they usually mean one of two very different problems. The first is what a booking platform or clinic-management vendor charges the clinic: a percentage of consultation revenue, a per-appointment fee, or some other cut taken by the software itself. The second is what the clinic owes its own doctors: the associate physician on a percentage split, the visiting consultant paid per consultation, the specialist on a procedure-based incentive. CuraVerto has a firm answer on the first and a real feature for the second, and mixing the two up is the most common confusion in this search category.
CuraVerto charges a flat annual fee per tier, excluding GST, with no commission on consultations and no per-doctor fee. That answers the first problem completely: the software bill does not move whether the clinic books 200 appointments a month or 2,000. The second problem, what the clinic pays its own doctors, is unrelated to platform pricing and still needs solving, and CuraVerto includes a doctor commission engine specifically for it.
Each doctor profile carries its own commission configuration: a model and a value. Two doctors in the same clinic can run on completely different structures, each set individually on their own profile, rather than one clinic-wide rule applied to everyone.
Every consultation or procedure that gets billed writes into a revenue ledger against the treating doctor. CuraVerto's payout view reads that ledger per doctor, applies each doctor's own commission model and value, and shows an unsettled balance, meaning what the clinic currently owes that doctor, alongside a history of what has already been paid out.
Recording a payout is a deliberate action by clinic staff, not something that happens automatically in the background. When a clinic settles with a doctor, finance staff record the payout against that doctor, the paid amount is logged with a status, and the unsettled balance drops by that amount. Access to recording payouts is restricted to the finance-manager and admin roles, and every payout write is captured in CuraVerto's audit log alongside who made the change and when.
A clinic charging patients anywhere from a few hundred to a couple thousand rupees a consultation, with two or three doctors on different splits, ends up doing the same reconciliation every month regardless of what the software vendor charges: how many consultations did each doctor see, what is the rate, what has already been paid, what is the running balance. Doing that by hand in a spreadsheet is where disputes start, and a doctor questioning a commission figure with no auditable record behind it is a real, recurring practice-management problem, not a hypothetical one.
The internal commission engine exists to remove that specific friction. The same billing event that generates a GST-compliant invoice for the patient also updates the commission ledger for the treating doctor, so there is one number behind both, not two competing counts kept in different places.
| Platform revenue share (not how CuraVerto is priced) | Internal doctor commission tracking (a CuraVerto feature) | |
|---|---|---|
| Who receives the money | The software vendor | The clinic's own doctor |
| Who sets the rate | The vendor's pricing team | The clinic, per doctor |
| Scales with appointment volume | Yes, the vendor's cut rises with volume | Yes, by design, since it is tracking what is genuinely owed |
| Optional to configure | No, applies automatically to every booking | Yes, only doctors with a commission model set are tracked |
| Where it shows up on CuraVerto | Nowhere, CuraVerto does not charge this | Doctor profile settings, payout ledger, finance dashboard |
Doctor commission is an internal payroll matter between the clinic and its doctor, separate from the GST invoice raised to the patient. What keeps the two consistent is the source data: every consultation generates a GST-compliant invoice with fiscal-year-based document numbering, and the payout ledger reads its revenue figures from those same billed amounts. The number a doctor's commission is calculated against is the same number that shows up in the clinic's own GST records for that fiscal year, not a second, separately maintained figure.
This matters most around fiscal year-end, when clinics reconcile both GST filings and doctor payouts near the same April 1 boundary. Reading both off the same underlying invoice data, instead of a parallel spreadsheet, is what keeps that reconciliation from turning into its own project.
No. CuraVerto charges a flat annual fee per tier, excluding GST, from ₹9,999 to ₹49,999 depending on plan, with no commission on consultations and no per-doctor fee. That flat fee is what the clinic pays CuraVerto. It has no connection to what the clinic pays its own doctors.
Each doctor's profile carries a commission model, either a percentage of the revenue they generate or a fixed amount per consultation, and a commission value. As consultations and procedures get billed, CuraVerto's revenue ledger accrues against the treating doctor using that model, so the running balance owed is calculated automatically instead of tallied by hand at month-end.
Yes. Commission model and value are set per doctor, so a senior consultant on a percentage split and a visiting doctor on a fixed per-visit rate can both be tracked correctly inside the same clinic account, each on their own configuration.
Recording a payout is restricted to the finance-manager and admin roles, and every payout write is captured in CuraVerto's audit log along with who made the change and when. A commission figure a doctor questions has a traceable record behind it, not a spreadsheet nobody can verify.
Commission tracking matters most once a clinic has more than one doctor to split revenue with. It sits inside CuraVerto's Payouts feature, included from the Pro tier upward, which also includes unlimited doctors. Essential is built for a single doctor and a single branch, so Payouts is not part of that tier, since there is no second doctor to track a split for.
No. The GST invoice raised to the patient is unaffected by how the clinic later splits that revenue with its doctor. What stays consistent is the source number: the payout ledger reads its figures from the same billed, GST-compliant invoice amounts that feed the clinic's own fiscal-year GST records, so the two never disagree.
Doctor commission and payout tracking live inside CuraVerto's Payouts feature, included from the Pro tier upward. Compare Essential, Pro, and Plus side by side and see exactly what each price includes.